Disposed

Raja Durai v. the Assistant Director

Madras HC24 Mar 2017WP(MD)/15278/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order directs the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2014 concerning reinstatement as Firka Surveyor. Without opining on merits, the Court grants a direction to pass an order on merits within four weeks and disposes of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider petitioner's representation and pass order on merits within four weeks.

Raja Durai Vs the Assistant Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 24.03.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.15278 of 2014

Raja Durai

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Assistant Director and

¶11

P.A. to District Collector (Land Survey), District land survey office,Madurai-20. ...Respondent

¶12

PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2014 and consequently to direct the respondent to revoke the order of suspension dated 26.08.2011, and to reinstate him into service as Firka Surveyor.

¶13

For Petitioner :Mr. D.Selvanayagam For Respondent :Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2014, and consequently to direct the respondent to revoke the order of suspension dated 26.08.2011, and to reinstate him into service as Firka Surveyor.

¶16

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be satisfied, if his representation dated 08.08.2014, is directed to be considered within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶17

3.Considering the limited scope of the prayer now sought for before this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's case, this Court is inclined to pass the following direction:

¶18

3.a.The respondent is directed to consider the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2014, and pass an order on the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of

¶19

¶20

four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

The Assistant Director and P.A. to District Collector (Land Survey), District land survey office, Madurai-20. +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.18180

¶27

W.P.(MD).No.15278 of 2014 24.03.2017

¶28

JM/SV MMS/SAR 4/19.04.2017/2P/3C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Raja Durai v. the Assistant Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Durai v. the Assistant Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Latha Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

G.Sahaya Rani, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

M. Karthikeyan, Vs the Head Master

M/S.a 616T Nelmudikarai Vs the Assistant Provident Fund

The Correspondent Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A.Jesur Mary Jennifer Vs the Director of Elementary