The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's PF Non-Refundable loan application within one month.
Direction to respondents to consider the PF Non-Refundable loan application and pass appropriate orders within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.02.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.(MD) No.1402 of 2017
D.Uthirapathy ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Kumbakonam) Limited,
Head Office, Kumbakonam Division,
Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Kumbakonam) Limited,
Pudukkottai Division,
Thirumayam Road, Pudukkottai.
3.The Branch Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Kumbakonam)Limited, Pattukkottai Branch, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District.
.. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus,directing the respondents to process the Petitioners provident Fund Non-Refundable loan application dated 16.12.2016 and disburse the loan amount within the time stipulated by this Court.
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondents to process the Petitioners provident Fund Non-Refundable loan application dated 16.12.2016 and disburse the loan amount within the time stipulated by this Court.
2.Mr.D.Sivaraman,learned counsel takes notice for the respondents. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
3.The case of the petitioner is that the Petitioner joined the
2
service of the respondents/Corporation with effect from 1.5.1995 and his provident number is 95 DR4106/17279. Since the Petitioner's wife was hospitalized, the Petitioner has submitted a Provident Fund Non-Refundable loan application, dated 16.12.2016 to the second respondent to meet out the medical expenses and since the said application did not evoke any response, the petitioner is before this Court with the relief stated supra.
5.In view of the submission, the respondents concerned is directed to consider the representation of the Provident Fund NonRefundable loan application, dated 16.12.2016 and to pass appropriate orders on the same in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment to do so.
6.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-I)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
1.The Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Kumbakonam) Limited,
Head Office, Kumbakonam Division, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Kumbakonam) Limited, Pudukkottai Division, Thirumayam Road, Pudukkottai.
3.The Branch Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Kumbakonam)Limited, Pattukkottai Branch, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur District. +1cc to M/s.D.SIVARAMAN Advocate in SR. No.9896 +1cc to M/s. C.BETHANASAMY Advocate in SR. No.10356 VSN
JS/SV/MMS/07.03.2017/2P-6C
W.P.(MD) No.1402 of 2017 22.02.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to process and consider the petitioner's Provident Fund Non-Refundable loan application within a stipulated time.
D. Uthirapathy
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Head Office, Kumbakonam Division, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Pudukkottai Division, Pudukkottai
The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Pattukkottai Branch, Pattukkottai
S. Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
