Disposed

K.Kasilingam v. the Special District Revenue

Madras HC12 Jul 2017WP(MD)/13293/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court directed the Special District Revenue Officer to consider the petitioner's representation regarding land acquisition compensation, afford an opportunity of hearing, and pass appropriate orders within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, afford an opportunity of hearing, and pass appropriate orders on merits within six weeks.

K.Kasilingam Vs the Special District Revenue — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.07.2017 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶4

W.P.(MD)No.13293 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014

K.Kasilingam

... Petitioner

-vs-

The Special District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition), National Highways, Ramanthapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶9

The Special Tahsildar, National Highways, Thiruvadanai (Camp), R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District.

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to dispose of the representation dated 26.6.2014 of the petitioner, which was received by the respondents on 27.6.2014.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Chandrasekar For Respondents : Mr.B.Pugalendhi Addl. Advocate General

¶13

***** O R D E R

¶14

This writ petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 26.6.2014 of the petitioner, which was received by the respondents on 27.6.2014.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents.

¶16

The case of the petitioner is that he has made a representation dated 26.06.2014 to the respondents for disbursement of the compensation amount to him and since the same did not evoke any response so far, the petitioner is before this Court with the above prayer.

¶17

Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the 1st respondent to consider the representation dated 26.06.2014 of the petitioner and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, pass https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

¶19

With the above direction, this petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar(ADII)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶23

To:

¶24

1. The Special District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition), National Highways, Ramanthapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
2. The Special Tahsildar, National Highways, Thiruvadanai (Camp), R.S.Mangalam, Ramanathapuram District.
+One cc to Mr.R.Vijayakumar, Advocate, SR.No.65333
+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.65328
ar/rm RL/5C/2P/SV/SAR1/24/7/2017
W.P.(MD)No.13293 of 2014 12/07/2017

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Kasilingam v. the Special District Revenue

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Kasilingam v. the Special District Revenue

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mn Nadar Primary School Vs Director of School Education

N.Vanjimuthu, S/O.Natchimuthu Vs the Commissioner of

R.Rajangam, Vs the Commissioner of

Sand Lorry Owners Welfare Vs the District Collector

K.Mary Vs the District Collector

C. Ramamoorthy Vs the District Collector