particular school has got sufficient or surplus teacher having regard to the strength of the pupils. According to him, proceedings are issued only in accordance with the norms fixed in the Grant-in-Aid Code of the Tamil Nadu Education Department as per Rules, regulation or order, as may be made or issued by the Government or the Director of School Education, from time to time, for appointment/deployment of teachers or others in any private school. He would further submit that the petitioner has wrongly come to this Court without even challenging the original order, dated 05.03.2015, fixing the strength of the students studying in Murugan Primary School, Punalveli. After applying the rules and regulations, the strength of the ratio of the studentsteachers was fixed on 05.03.2015 and that being so, therefore, the petitioner should have challenged the said order, dated 05.03.2015, and not the consequential impugned order passed by the second respondent dated 22.07.2015 and hence, the writ petition, challenging only the consequential order, dated 22.07.2015, is not legally sustainable. Further, the reasons for transferring the petitioner to Perunthalaivar Kamarajar Primary School, Meenakshipuram, have been clearly mentioned in the previous order dated 05.03.2015. According to him, since the petitioner has already accepted the original order, dated 05.03.2015, fixing the students-teacher ratio, now she cannot challenge the impugned order.
