Allowed

K.Murugan, S/O. Kumaraiah, v. the Deputy Superintendent

Madras HC5 Jul 2017WP(MD)/12186/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a writ petition quashing the police order rejecting permission to conduct an 'Aadal Padal Programme'. The court found the impugned order lacked specific details regarding law and order concerns and directed the police to grant permission subject to conduct conditions.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to conduct Aadal Paadal Programme on 12.07.2017 at Achankulam Village, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District, subject to conditions ensuring orderly proceedings and no obscene co

K.Murugan, S/O. Kumaraiah, Vs the Deputy Superintendent — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 05.07.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.12186 of 2017

K.Murugan

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai Division, Sivagangai District.

¶11

2.The Inspector of Police, Poovanthi Police Station, Poovanthi, Sivagangai District.

¶12

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Pazhayanoor Police Station, Pazhayanoor,

¶13

Sivagangai District. .. Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 1^st respondent vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.12/ Forecast/Ka.Thu.Ka / Mana/2017 dated 27.06.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission to conduct the “Aadal Padal Programme” on 12.07.2017 at Achankulam Village, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶15

For petitioner : Mr.V.Muthukamatchi For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan Special Government Pleader

¶16

O R D E R ************

¶17

(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J )

¶18

The petitioner herein has filed the instant writ petition questioning the order dated 27.06.2017 passed by the first respondent rejecting his application for conducting Aadal Paadal programme on 12.07.2017.

¶19

2.Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The reason set out in the impugned order is that there is a likelihood of causing of law and order problem. We find the

¶21

¶22

reason assigned in the impugned order and there is bereft of specific details and therefore, we are inclined to allow this writ petition quashing the order of rejection.

¶23

4.The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the

¶24

respondents would also not state any specific reasons for sustaining the order of rejection. We therefore, allow this writ petition directing the second respondent to permit the petitioner to conduct Aadal Paadal Programme on 12.07.2017 subject to the following conditions:-

¶25

The second respondent is directed to grant permission to the writ petitioner to conduct "Aadal Padal programme" at Achankulam Village, Thiruppuvanam Taluk, Sivagangai District, subject to the following conditions:

¶26

The event shall be conducted in an organised and peaceful manner without causing any law and order problem.

¶27

There shall not be any obscene or vulgar scenes during the dance performance by any one of the participants or others.

¶28

The programme timings shall be between 06.00 p.m. and 10.00 p.m. on 12.07.2017.

¶29

If there is any violation of the above said conditions, the second respondent or the duly authorised officer is entitled to take necessary action as per law and stop such performance.

¶30

The Writ Petition is disposed of, with the above

¶31

directions. No costs.

¶32

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶33

/True Copy/

¶34

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶35

To:

¶36

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manamadurai Division, Sivagangai District.

¶37

2.The Inspector of Police, Poovanthi Police Station, Poovanthi, Sivagangai District.

¶38

3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Pazhayanoor Police Station, Pazhayanoor, Sivagangai District.

¶39

+1cc to M/S.Special Government Pleader,SR.63974

¶40

+1cc to Mr.V.Muthukamatchi, Advocate,SR.63555

¶41

W.P(MD)No.12186 of 2017

¶42

05.07.2017

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ RJ2/PSD KK/SKN RSK/SAR1-11.07.2017-2P-6C

K.Murugan, S/O. Kumaraiah, v. the Deputy Superintendent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Murugan, S/O. Kumaraiah, v. the Deputy Superintendent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Director, Vs the Presiding Officer

The Executive Engineer Vs G. Nagarajan, Assessor

Dr.a.Udayakumar Vs Union of India

A.Ocha Thevar, Vs the Special Officer

Selvakumar Vs the Superintendent of Police

G. Murali Vs the Superintendent of Police