Dr. A. Udayakumar withdrew a writ appeal filed under the Letter Patent Act challenging a lower court order regarding his retirement age and service continuation, obtaining liberty to seek benefits from the university.
None. Writ Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted to seek benefits from the respondent university.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2017 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.A.(MD)No.834 of 2017 and C.M.P(MD) No.5734 of 2017
Dr.A.Udayakumar ..Appellant
Vs.
1.Union of India Represented by its Secretary Ministry of Human Resources Development New Delhi. 2.The Director General Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) Krishi Bhawan New Delhi. 3.The Registrar Gandhigram Rural Institute (Deemed University) Gandhigram, Dindigul District. 4.The Director, ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institue (ATARI) MRS, H.A. Farm, Hebbal, Bengaluru - 560 024. 5.The Director, ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institue (ATARI) Zone V, Crida Campus, Santhosh Nagar, Hyderabad - 59. ..Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Appeal is filed under clause 15 of Letter Patent Act, to set aside the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.10983 of 2017 dated 14.06.2017.
Prayer in WP(MD). 10983/ 2017 :
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of
2
Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 4th respondent in his proceedings in F.No. ADMN. 5-35/ZPD/2012 dated 24.05.2017 rejecting petitioners request for the continuation of service as Programme Coordinator till June, 2019 considering his age of retirement as 62 years and set aside the same as illegal and the consequent direction may be issued directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in service till June, 2019 considering his age of retirement as 62 years and also to extend him all the service and monetary benefits in par with the employees of the third respondent University.
For petitioner : Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For R1 and R2 : Mr.S.Jeyasingh, Central Government Standing Counsel
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J .]
The learned counsel for the appellant has made an endorsement indicating that he is withdrawing the Writ Appeal with liberty to submit a representation to the Gandhigram Rural Institute to pay him the benefits available to the post of subject matter specialist.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Writs)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
1.The Secretary,
Union of India,
Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delhi.
2.The Director General,
Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), Krishi Bhawan,
New Delhi.
3.The Registrar,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Gandhigram Rural Institute (Deemed University), Gandhigram, Dindigul District.
3
4.The Director, ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institue (ATARI) MRS, H.A. Farm, Hebbal, Bengaluru - 560 024. 5.The Director, ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institue (ATARI) Zone V, Crida Campus, Santhosh Nagar, Hyderabad – 59. +1cc to M/S.S.Jeyasingh, Advocate SR.No. 63447 +1cc to M/S.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate SR.No. 63558
JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)Nos.834 of 2017 04.07.2017 rj2/rm JM/SKN RSK/SAR 2/13.07.2017/3P/7C
Dr. A. Udayakumar
Union of India
K.K.SASIDHARAN
G.R.SWAMINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
