The Madurai Bench dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 as withdrawn by the petitioner, though the original prayer sought impounding of the respondent's passport.
No costs. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED 09.03.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P(MD)No.10511 of 2016
D.Nagarajan
..Petitioner
Vs
1.The Regional Passport Officer,
Madurai – 625 016.
2.T.Saravanan ..Respondents.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to impound the passport of the second respondent viz namely T.Saravanan, son of Thiruvenkadam, residing at No.567, Singapore Nagar, Kallampatti, Madurai.
For Petitioner :M/s.D.Shanmujgaraja Sethupathi
For Respondent-1 :Mr.R.Nandakumar Senior Panel Counsel
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
The Regional Passport Officer, Claret Plaza, Melakkal Road, Kochadai, Madurai – 625 016.
+1cc to M/s.D.SHANMUGARAJA SETHUPATHI Advocate in SR. No.13587 VSN JS/PM/20.03.2017/2P-3C
W.P(MD)No.10511 of 2016
09.03.2017
D. Nagarajan
The Regional Passport Officer
T. Saravanan
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
