The single-judge High Court allowed the Writ Petition and quashed the impugned order of the 2nd respondent dated 13.06.2012 which annulled a petitioner sale deed, holding that the annulment was based on a withdrawn Circular No.67. Costs were not awarded.
The impugned order dated 13.06.2012 passed by the 2nd respondent is quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 26.10.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN
Writ Petition No.8876 of 2013
and
M.P.No.2 of 2013
1.N.Thangavel
2.T.Sumathi ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. The Inspector General of Registration
Mylapore, chennai-600 004
2. The South Chennai District Registrar (Administration)
No.9, Jeenis Road, Saidapet,
Chennai-600 015
3. The Sub Register Officer
Tambaram Sub-Register Office
Tambaram, Chennai
4. K.Sriraman ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of
India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the
records relating to the impugned Circular No.67 dated
03.11.2011 in C.No.52338/C1/2011 on the file of the 1st
respondent and the subsequent order dated 13.06.2012 made in
Pa.Mu.No.3876/A1/2012 passed by the 2 nd respondent and quash
the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramajayam For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar, Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 No appearance for R4
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM,J.)
This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent
dated 13.06.2012 in Pa.Mu.No.3876/A1/2012 in view of the Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011 and quash the same, by way of issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus.
In fine, this Writ Petition is allowed without costs. The impugned order dated 13.06.2012 passed by the 2nd respondent is quashed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nvsri
To
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Tambaram, Chennai.
Copy To
The Record Keeper, E.R.Section, High Court, Madras 104.
+1cc to Mr.S.Ramajayam, Advocate, S.R.No.75633 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.76348
Writ Petition No.8876 of 2013 AR V CA(09/11/2017)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of 13.06.2012 quashing the sale deed should be quashed in light of the withdrawal of Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011.
N.Thangavel
T.Sumathi
K.Sriraman
A.SELVAM
P.KALAIYARASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
