This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 26.10.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN
Writ Petition No.27711 of 2012
and M.P.No.2 of 2012
S.Nagamanickam
alias S.N.Manickam ... Petitioner
vs.
1.The Inspector General of Registration
100, Santhome High Court, Pattinapakkam
Chennai-600 028
2.The District Registrar
(Administration) Tiruppur
3.The Sub Registrar, Udumalpet
4.C.V.Sunny
5.Lilly Sunny ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order of the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai, in Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011 (C.No.52338/C1/2011) and quash the said order.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Nicholas For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar, AGP for R1 to R3 Mr.M.R.Thangavel, for R4 and R5
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM,J.)
As per endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nvsri
To
1.The Inspector General of Registration
100, Santhome High Court, Pattinapakkam
Chennai-600 028
2.The District Registrar
(Administration) Tiruppur
3.The Sub Registrar, Udumalpet
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 76354
+1cc to Mr.V.NICHOLAS Advocate, S.R.No. 76038
Writ Petition No.27711 of 2012
TR(17/11/2017)
S.Nagamanickam alias S.N.Manickam
The Inspector General of Registration
The District Registrar (Administration) Tiruppur
The Sub Registrar, Udumalpet
C.V.Sunny
Lilly Sunny
A.Selvam
P.Kalaiyarasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
