Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking direction to consider a representation was withdrawn by the petitioner. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.04.2017
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P. No.8655 of 2017
T.Dhanasekaran .. Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Chief Election Commissioner,
Election Commission of India,
Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110 001.
2.The Chief Election Commissioner,
State of Tamil Nadu, 100 Feet Road,
Koyambedu, Madras 600 107. .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 31.10.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondents : Mr.M.K.Subramanian, Govt. Pleader * * * * * O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. Endorsement is also made.
2.Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
sra
To
1.The Chief Election Commissioner,
Election Commission of India,
Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110 001.
2.The Chief Election Commissioner,
State of Tamil Nadu, 100 Feet Road,
Koyambedu, Madras 600 107.
+1 CC to Government Pleader, High Court, Chennai Sr.No.22080
W.P.No.8655 of 2017
SJ(CO)
KP(21.04.2017)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.Dhanasekaran
The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India
The Chief Election Commissioner, State of Tamil Nadu
INDIRA BANERJEE
M.SUNDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
