Kannan v. The Regional Deputy
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner appealed for a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash an order denying site allotment and seek residence site allotment. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
None. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.04.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MS. INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.No.8528 of 2017
Kannan ...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Regional Deputy Commissioner Central
Chennai Corporation
Rippon Buildings
Chennai – 600 003.
2. The Zonal Officer
Zone-7, Ambattur
Chennai. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the first respondent made in Z.O.VII.C.No.E1/08477/2014, dated 20.2.2015, quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents to allot a suitable, fit and proper site for residence to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Veerabathiran For Respondents : Mr.V.C.Selvasekaran
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kannan
- respondent
The Regional Deputy Commissioner Central, Chennai Corporation
- respondent
The Zonal Officer, Zone-7, Ambattur
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court