The honorable court dismissed W.P. No. 8569 of 2017 on the前提是 that the petitioner's counsel filed an application to withdraw the petition with an endorsement in the petition, recording the withdrawal order.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.07.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WRIT PETITION No. 8569 of 2017
S.Chitra ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Director General of Police,
Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai,
Chennai.
2. The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram.
3. Mr.Kumaraiya,
The Inspector of Police,
Ulundurpet Police Station,
Villupuram District.
4. R.Arumugam ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner representation letter dated 25.03.2017 and to take departmental action against the third respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramajayam For Respondents : Mr.S.Gunasekaran (For R1 & R2) Additional Government Pleader
2
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought to
withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement in the petition. Recording his submission and the endorsement made to that
effect, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
04.07.2017
maya
To
1. The Director General of Police,
Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai,
Chennai.
2. The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram.
3
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J
maya
W.P.No.8569 of 2017
04.07.2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Chitra
The Director General of Police
The Superintendent of Police
Mr. Kumaraiya
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
