Disposed

S.Kayalvizhi, v. The Director of Social Welfare

Madras HC4 Jul 2017WP/14991/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court, by writ petition under Article 226, directed the Director of Social Welfare to consider the petitioner's representation regarding appointment as a meal organizer and pass orders on merits within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the first respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and pass orders on merits within eight weeks.

S.Kayalvizhi, Vs The Director of Social Welfare — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.07.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

W.P.No.14991 of 2017

S.Kayalvizhi

.. Petitioner

vs.
1.The Director of Social Welfare
Garment Complex Sidco Corporate Office
Old Building, Guindy Industrial Estate
Guindy, Chennai 600 032.
2.The District Collector
Nagapattinam District
Nagapattinam.
3.The Commissioner
Sirkazhi Panchayat Union
Sirkazhi, Nagapattinam District.
4.P.Parimala .. Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation/appeal dated 30.05.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law regarding appointment of petitioner as Nutritious Meal Organizer at Soorakadu Panchayat Union Elementary School, Sirkazhi Panchayat Union, Nagapattinam District by cancelling the irregular appointment made to the fourth respondent herein by the second respondent.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govindaraj

¶11

For Respondents : Mr.K.Dhananjeyan for R1 to R3 Special Government Pleader O R D E R

¶12

By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

Heard Mr.K.Govindaraj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Dhanajeyan, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶15

The restricted prayer sought for in this writ petition is to consider the appeal/representation submitted by the writ petitioner before the first respondent on 30.05.2017 with regard to the recruitment to the post of Noon-Meal Organizer.

¶16

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitioner is fully qualified for appointment and got selected. Further the writ petitioner is a widow and residing within 3km radius from the Centre for which recruitment process has undertaken.

¶17

Such view of the matter, this court is inclined to direct the first respondent to consider the representation / appeal submitted by the petitioner on 30.05.2017 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dna/gpa To 1.The Director of Social Welfare Garment Complex Sidco Corporate Office Old Building, Guindy Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai 600 032. 2.The District Collector Nagapattinam District Nagapattinam. 3.The Commissioner Sirkazhi Panchayat Union Sirkazhi, Nagapattinam District. +1 cc to Mr.K.Govindaraj Advocate sr 46427 +1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 46877

¶19

W.P.No.14991 of 2017

¶20

arv aa19/07/2017

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Kayalvizhi, v. The Director of Social Welfare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Kayalvizhi, v. The Director of Social Welfare

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Venkatesan Vs The Commissioner

Mrs.Jayapradha.E Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

N.Nallappan Vs The Deputy Regitrar of

S.Chitra, W/o.Sivakumar, Vs The Director General of Police

N.Baskaran, Vs Secretary

Dr.Lakshmipriya Vs The Government of