Dismissed

Saravanan v. The Commissioner

Madras HC7 Apr 2017WP/8348/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition filed by a street vendor seeking permission to run their bunk shop. It held that since the Vending Committee was constitutionally validly established, the petitioner must approach the Committee for the license, rendering the writ petition maintainable. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of; the petitioner is directed to approach the Vending Committee for the license.

Saravanan Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 07.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The HON'BLE MS.INDIRA BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P.No.8348 of 2017

¶7

Saravanan .. Petitioner
vs.
1 The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings,
Chennai-600 003.
2 The Chairperson /
Zonal Executive Engineer Zone VII,
(The Township Vending Committee)
Corporation of Chennai,
Chennai – 600 058.
3 The Administrative Director,
SIDCO Small Factory Industrial Estate,
Ambattur,
Chennai – 600 058. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus
directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on
the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2017 as per the
provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood
Regulation) Act, 2014 made for granting permission /
certificate of vending and till such time not to disturb
with the running of the petitioner's bunk shop near TCI,
Ambit Buildings, Ambit Road, Ambattur, Chennai-600 058.
For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar
For Respondents : Mr.A.Nagarajan

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

ORDER

¶10

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶11

In view of the Vending Committee having been constituted vide G.O. (4D) No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MCI) Department, dated 05.10.2016 and the proceedings of the Commissioner of Corporation in RDC.No.007/2016, dated 1.11.2016 nominating the members of the Vending Committee, we are not inclined to maintain the writ petition and it is for the petitioner to approach the Vending Committee for obtaining the license.

¶12

The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No
costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bbr
To:
1 The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Buildings,
Chennai-600 003.
2 The Chairperson /
Zonal Executive Engineer Zone VII,
(The Township Vending Committee)
Corporation of Chennai,
Chennai – 600 058.
3 The Administrative Director,
SIDCO Small Factory Industrial Estate,
Ambattur,
Chennai – 600 058.
+1cc to Mr.A. Nagarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.21357
+1cc to Mr.L.Chandra Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.21226
PVS(CO)
EU 24.4.17

¶13

W.P.No.8348 of 2017

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Saravanan v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saravanan v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmi Vs The Commissioner

Kala Vs The Commissioner

Devi Vs The Commissioner

S.H.Faud Basha Vs The Commissioner

S.Pushpalatha, Vs The Government of

Chitra Vs The Commissioner