S.Radhai v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to stop construction in a vacant area claimed for maintenance. Counsel withdrew the petition, resulting in dismissal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.04.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
W.P.No.8053 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.8804 of 2017
S.Radhai ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
2.The Commissioner,
Nellikuppam Municipality,
Nellikuppam, Cuddalore District. ...Respondents
Prayer: This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second respondent from putting up public convenience in the vacant area measuring about 750 sq.ft., belonging to the second respondent which is situated between the premises of the petitioner i.e. Door No.102, in Survey No.1 to 7 (Old Survey No.142) in Ward C, Block 14 (Now Ward NO.16), Gudithangi Main Road, Nellikuppam and the Panruti Cuddalore Main Road, without affording an opportunity to the petitioner as the said vacant area is under the maintenance of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Moorthy
For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar Additional Government Pleader
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Radhai
- respondent
The District Collector, Cuddalore District
- respondent
The Commissioner, Nellikuppam Municipality
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court