Disposed

P.Veeramuthu, v. The Commissioner

Madras HC6 Apr 2017WP/517/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court heard a writ petition challenging alleged interference with the petitioner's possession of land. Directing respondents to take appropriate action after verifying land status via the Tahsildar with due notice, the court disposed of the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents 2 and 3 to take appropriate action after due notice to petitioner pending reply from Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk.

P.Veeramuthu, Vs The Commissioner — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.04.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

WRIT PETITION No. 517 of 2017

¶6

and W.M.P.No.543 of 2017

¶7

P.Veeramuthu ...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Chennai – 600 003.
2. The Assistant Executive Engineer
The Zonal Officer,
Zone No.14, Ward No.189,
Zonal Office,
Corporation of Chennai,
Pallikaranai, Chennai – 100.
3. Mr.Mohanavadivelu,
The Zonal Officer,
Zone No.14, Ward No.189,
Zonal Office,
Corporation of Chennai,
Pallikaranai, Chennai – 100.
4.The Inspector of Police,
Pallikaranai Police Station,
Pallikaranai, Chennai – 100. ...Respondents

¶8

Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order or direction in the nature of writ, forbearing the respondents, their men, agents, servants or any other persons claiming through them, from in any way disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property of the petitioner, measuring Ac.0.13 cents (i.e.5668 sq ft) comprised in S.No.327/4, situated at Pallikaranai Village Ward No.189, Zone No.14, within Corporation of Chennai, Sholinganalur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Ramalingam For Respndents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar – for R1 to R3 Mr.S.Diwakar –for R4 Special Government Pleader

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

Heard Mr.A.Ramalingam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr.S.Diwakar, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the fourth respondent.

¶13

2.Alleging that the respondents Nos.1 to 3 are interfering with the peaceful possession of his land and seeking a direction not to disturb such possession without due process of Law, the petitioner has come forward to file this present writ petition.

¶14

3.In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents 2 and 3, it has been stated that action was taken to clear the stagnation of water which has been objected to, by the petitioner. It is further stated that to know the genuineness of the petitioner's claim, the Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk was requested to throw some light on the nature of land as per the letter dated 09.01.2017 and on receipt of the same, appropriate action would be taken.

¶15

4.In view of the aforesaid stand, the respondents 2 and 3, as the case may be, are directed to take appropriate action after due notice to the petitioner in pursuant to the reply, if any, to be given by the Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk.

¶16

5.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

¶21

The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Chennai – 600 003.
2. The Assistant Executive Engineer/
The Zonal Officer,
Zone No.14, Ward No.189,
Zonal Office,
Corporation of Chennai,
Pallikaranai, Chennai – 100.
3. Mr.Mohanavadivelu,
The Zonal Officer,
Zone No.14, Ward No.189,
Zonal Office,
Corporation of Chennai,
Pallikaranai, Chennai – 100.
4.The Inspector of Police,
Pallikaranai Police Station,
Pallikaranai, Chennai – 100.
+1cc to Mr.R. Ramalingam, Advocate, S.R.No.21162
+1cc to Mr.Pr. Selvakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.20622
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.21026
lrs(CO)
md(19/04/2017)
WRIT PETITION No. 517 of 2017
and W.M.P.No.543 of 2017

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Veeramuthu, v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Veeramuthu, v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prime Tex Unit-B Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Mrs.D.Zeenath Vs The Managing Director

S.Radhai Vs The District Collector

M/s.Blue Ocean Personnel & Vs The Regional Director

Mrs.a.Meena, Vs The Principal Secretary

R.Deivanai, Vs The District Collector