M.Palanivel, v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus against the second respondent was dismissed as withdrawn by the Court upon request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.09.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.5091 of 2017
M.Palanivel [ Petitioner ]
Vs 1 The District Collector Salem District Salem
2 Sundaraji [Respondents]
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the First Respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.02.2017 to initiate appropriate action against the Second Respondent herein in accordance with law to secure the ends of justice.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ramesh
For Respondents : Mr.R.Rajeswaran, SGP (R1)
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted a letter dated 11.09.2017 to the Registry seeking permission of this Court to post the above writ petition for withdrawal. The matter is listed today under the heading for withdrawal. When the matter is taken up today, a similar request is made before this Court and an endorsement has also been made to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rg
To
The District Collector Salem District Salem.
W.P.No.5091 of 2017
MG(CO) EU 18.09.17
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Palanivel
The District Collector Salem District Salem
Sundaraji
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court