Disposed

Dr.M.Chandran v. The Vice Chancellor

Madras HC15 Sept 2017WP/475/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras held that the University is eligible to issue a No Objection Certificate if the petitioner is found meritorious. It directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders on merits within four weeks, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders on merits within four weeks.

Dr.M.Chandran Vs The Vice Chancellor — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.09.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.475 of 2017

¶6

Dr.M.Chandran ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1. The Vice Chancellor, Thiruvalluvar University, Serkadu – 632 115, Vellore District.

¶9

2. The Thiruvalluvar University, Rep. By its Registrar, Serkadu – 632 115, Vellore District.

¶10

3. Dr.Pakkirisamy Asokan, Registrar-in-charge/ Controller of Examinations (On Extension)/ Finance Officer-in-charge, Thiruvalluvar University, Serkadu – 632 115. Vellore District. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent-University to issue to the petitioner the No Objection Certificate on the basis of his representation dated 05.12.2016 within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.M.C.Swamy For R3 : No Appearance

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to issue No Objection Certificate to the writ petitioner based on the representation dated 05.12.2016.

¶15

The grievances of the writ petitioner is that No Objection Certificate due to him has not been issued by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent-University.

¶16

The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, made a fair submission that if the writ petitioner is otherwise eligible in accordance with the rules, No Objection Certificate will be issued by considering his application.

¶17

Thus, without going into the merits of the matter, the respondents 1 & 2 are directed to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 05.12.2016 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petitioner is directed to enclose the copy of the representation along with the order passed in this writ petition and accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶18

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
msm
To
1. The Vice Chancellor,
Thiruvalluvar University,
Serkadu – 632 115,
Vellore District.
2. The Registrar,
The Thiruvalluvar University,
Serkadu – 632 115,
Vellore District.
+1cc to Mr.C.Senthilnathan, Advocate SR.No.67824
+1cc to Mr.S.Sathiachandran, Advocate SR.No.67980
W.P.No.475 of 2017
NRI(CO)
GN(07/11/2017)

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr.M.Chandran v. The Vice Chancellor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.M.Chandran v. The Vice Chancellor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Jeya, Vs The Director

S.Govindasamy, S/o.Chinnammal Vs The District Collector

M.Lettice Mary, Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

A.Sekar, Vs The District Collector

G.Sudalaimuthu Vs The District Collector

M.Siva Subramanian Vs Dhakshinamoorthy