A.Sekar, v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
petitioner sought writ directing service recognition but withdrew the petition which court dismissed as withdrawn
What did the court decide?
petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.09.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.21046 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.25430 of 2016
A.Sekar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Salem District,
Salem.
2. The Assistant Director of Town Panchayat,
Cuddalore Zone,
Cuddalore District.
3. The Executive Officer,
Chinna Salem Town Panchayat,
Chinna Salem. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2016 and count the period from 01.05.2002 to 14.12.2006 as service period and extend all service and monetary benefits to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Indhumanthi For RR 1 & 2 : Mr.C.C.Rangarajan Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.M.L.Mahendran O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Sekar
- respondent
The District Collector, Salem District
- respondent
The Assistant Director of Town Panchayat, Cuddalore Zone
- respondent
The Executive Officer, Chinna Salem Town Panchayat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court