A.Pavadaisamy v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner in a writ petition seeking quashing of rejection of patta claim withdrew the petition with liberty to file an appeal. The High Court dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 02.01.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
W.P.No.44698 of 2016
A.pavadaisamy ... Petitioner Vs The Tahsildar, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore. ... Respondent
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records pertaining Na.Ka.F.No.2/2169/2016 dated 28.07.2016 and to quash the same and direct the respondent to conduct proper enquiry over the petitioner's representation dated 11.04.2016 and to issue patta in respect of the property bearing Survey No.245/1, Door No.145, Kothoosi Gurusamy Salai, Cuddalore Mudhu Nagar, Cuddalore District.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Pavadaisamy, Party-in-person For Respondent : Mr.S.Rajeswaran, Special Government Pleader. **** O R D E R The petitioner/party-in-person is present before this Court.
- This writ petition is filed as against the order passed by the Tahsildar, in which the petitioner's claim for grant of patta has been rejected. Since there is an appeal remedy as against the order of the Tahsildar, the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Pavadaisamy
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore
Coram
B. Rajendran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court