In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought a direction to transfer a patta in his name. The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representations on merits and pass appropriate orders within two months.
Direction to respondents to consider representations on merits and pass appropriate orders within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
WRIT PETITION No.44537 of 2016
K.Natarajan ... Petitioner
vs.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to act upon the petitioner's representation dated 26.02.2016 and transfer the patta in the name of the petitioner within a stipulated period.
O R D E R
The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider his representation dated 26.02.2016 and transfer the patta in his name, within a stipulated period.
+1cc to Mr.Mahaveer shivaji, Advocate, S.R.No.57 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.434
kgk(CO) md(16/02/2017)
W.P.No.44537 of 2016
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representations on merits and transfer the patta to his name.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction to transfer the patta within a stipulated period.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Natarajan
The District Collector, Thiruvallur District
B. Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
