V.Harikrishnan Naicker, v. The Inspector General of
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN
WRIT PETITION No.44524 of 2016
V.Harikrishnan Naicker
... Petitioner
vs.
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to initiate enquiry on the petitioner's complaint dated 13.10.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Ramar For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajeswaran,
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.
as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.2063 vsn(CO) md(31/01/2017) W.P.No.44194 of 2016
V.Harikrishnan Naicker
The District Registrar of Registration, Office of the District Registrar of Registration, Chengalpet
The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai
The Sub Registrar of Registration, Office of the Sub Registrar of Registration, Joint - III, Chengalpet
R.Nachi Patel
Mahindra World City Developers Ltd.
B.Rajendran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court