Dismissed

S.Jagatheesan, v. Dr.C.Chandromouli, Ias.

Madras HC5 Jan 2017CONT P/2092/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In these contempt petitions filed for willful disobedience of a previous court order, petitioners sought promotion. The court directed respondents to pass appropriate promotion orders for petitioners within eight weeks after accepting their affidavit agreeing to a 2015 promotion year.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to pass appropriate promotion orders within eight weeks; Contempt Petitions closed.

S.Jagatheesan, Vs Dr.C.Chandromouli, Ias. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.01.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶6

Contempt Petition Nos.2092 to 2096 of 2016

¶7

S.Jagatheesan ... Petitioner in Cont .Petn. No.2092
of 2016
M.Sampath Raja ... Petitioner in Cont. Petn. No.2093
of 2016
A.Pannerselvam ... Petitioner in Cont. Petn. No.2094
of 2016
P.Vijayakumar ... Petitioner in Cont. Petn.No.2095
of 2016
K.Perumal ... Petitioner in Cont. Petn. No.2096
of 2016
vs.
1. Dr.C.Chandramouli, I.A.S.,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by its Secretary (FAC),
Commercial Taxes Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai - 9.
2. Dr.C.Chandramouli, I.A.S.,
Principal Secretary/
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Commercial Taxes Department,
Ezhilagam, Chepuak,
Chennai - 5. ... Respondents in all
Contempt Petitions
Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondents
for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated
27.06.2016 passed in W.P.Nos.8845 to 8849 of 2015.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

¶10

For Petitioner in all Cont. Petns : Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondents in all Cont. Petns : Mr.Kanmani Annamalai, Addl.Govt. Pleader (Taxes)

¶11

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶12

Since the issue involved in all these Petitions is one and the same, the matters are taken up for disposal by a common order.

¶13

Today, all the petitioners have filed an affidavit stating that even though they are entitled to be promoted in the panel for 2014 on the 1st March of 2014 on the basis of the exemption granted to adhoc promotees, now, they are agreeable for considering their names for promotion as on 1st March 2015, which is the crucial date fixed by the respondents for promotion. In such view of the matter, the petitioners seek that the authorities will pass appropriate orders promoting them from the year 2015.

¶14

affidavit dated 17.12.2016 produced by the petitioners

¶15

before this Court today, this Court directs the respondents to pass appropriate orders with regard to the promotion of

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

¶18

the petitioners, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

These Contempt Petitions are closed with the above

¶20

direction.

¶21

Sd/-
JOINT REGISTRAR(OS)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2016.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
Sm/CO/27/01/2017
To
1. Dr.C.Chandramouli, I.A.S.,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by its Secretary (FAC),
Commercial Taxes Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai - 9.
2. Dr.C.Chandramouli, I.A.S.,
Principal Secretary/
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Commercial Taxes Department,
Ezhilagam, Chepuak,
Chennai - 5.
5 CC's to M/s.S.Doraisamy, Advocate, Sr.No.223
One cc to Spl.Govt.Pleader, Sr.No.240/2017.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Jagatheesan, v. Dr.C.Chandromouli, Ias.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Jagatheesan, v. Dr.C.Chandromouli, Ias.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.v.Sugantha, Vs The District Collector

G.Gunasekaran Vs The Secretary to Government

S.K.Thangavel, Vs The Commissioner

M.Gunasekaran, Vs State rep. by

Arun Louis Sasikumar, Vs The Registrar

K.Thirunavukarasu Mudaliyar Vs Govt. of Tamil Nadu