Disposed

K.Thirunavukarasu Mudaliyar v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC5 Jan 2017WP/43853/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226, the High Court of Madras directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.09.2016 regarding inclusion in the Trust Board and School Committee, giving notice to all parties and passing appropriate orders within six months.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.09.2016 after giving notice to all parties and pass appropriate orders within six months.

K.Thirunavukarasu Mudaliyar Vs Govt. of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶3

Dated: 05.01.2017

¶4

Coram

¶5

The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶6

W.P.No.43853 of 2016

¶7

1 K.Thirunavukarasu Mudaliyar

¶8

[ PETITIONER ]

¶9

¶10

1 Govt. of Tamil Nadu Rep by Secretary to Govt., School Education Dept. , Secretariat, Chennai.

¶11

2 The Director of School Education, Chennai-600 006.

¶12

3 The Chief Educational Officer, Kancheepuram.

¶13

4 The District Educational Officer, Kancheepuram.

¶14

5 The Secretary, Ambalavanan Araporuppu Ayam, Wallajabad, Kancheepuram District. [ RESPONDENTS ]

¶15

Prayer:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take immediate steps to include the petitioner or other member of the Founders Family to the Trust Board of the Trust and School Committee in the light of the order dated 08.02.2016 of the Honourable Supreme Court of India in SLP(C) No.13055/2012 in C.A.No.968/2016 and by considering the petitioner representation dated 22.09.2016.

¶16

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan Senior Counsel for M/s.AL.Gandhimathi For Respondents : Mr.V.Anandamoorthy Additional Government Pleader

¶18

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take immediate steps to include the petitioner or other member of the Founders Family to the Trust Board of the Trust and School Committee in the light of the order dated 08.02.2016 of the Honourable Supreme Court of India in SLP(C) No.13055/2012 in C.A.No.968/2016 and by considering the petitioner representation dated 22.09.2016.

¶19

2.According to the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, in the earlier round of litigation, the Hon'ble Supreme Court by order dated 08.02.2016 in SLP No.13055 of 2012 in C.A.No.968 of 2016, has passed an order directing the concerned authority to hear the matter within a period of six months.

¶20

Pursuant to the same, no order has been passed till date.

¶21

3.According to the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, till date no order has been passed in the petitioner's sister's application.

¶22

¶23

Subsequently, the petitioner made a representation 22.09.2016 to consider his name also in the light of the supreme court order along with the application which was originally filed by his sister. Since the petitioner's sister application has not been considered till date, the petitioner's representation along with that application shall be heard together.

¶24

4.Learned counsel for the respondent would contend that the matter is pending from the year 2011, whereas the petitioner is not a party but taking into consideration the order of the Supreme Court and till date the matter is pending, the second respondent may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner.

¶25

5.Heard both sides.

¶26

6.Taking into consideration of the supreme Court order and since the matter is pending from the year 2011 and till date no order has been passed, this court directs the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 22.09.2016 also, after giving notice to all parties including the petitioner's sister and the fifth respondent herein and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six months.

¶27

¶28

B.RAJENDRAN,J. Vri

¶29

7.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

No costs.

05.01.2017

vri

1 Govt. of Tamil Nadu

¶35

Rep by Secretary to Govt. School Education Dept. ,

¶36

Secretariat, Chennai.

¶37

2 The Director of School Education,

¶38

Chennai-600 006.

¶39

3 The Chief Educational Officer, Kancheepuram.

¶40

4 The District Educational Officer, Kancheepuram.

¶41

5 The Secretary, Ambalavanan Araporuppu Ayam, Wallajabad,

¶42

Kancheepuram District.

¶43

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶44

W.P.No.43853 of 2016

K.Thirunavukarasu Mudaliyar v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Thirunavukarasu Mudaliyar v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.v.Sugantha, Vs The District Collector

G.Gunasekaran Vs The Secretary to Government

S.K.Thangavel, Vs The Commissioner

M.Gunasekaran, Vs State rep. by

Arun Louis Sasikumar, Vs The Registrar

B.Sellamal, W/o.Bannari, Vs The District Collector