Disposed

B.Sellamal, W/o.Bannari, v. The District Collector

Madras HC5 Jan 2017WP/43333/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 226, the petitioner sought a direction for the respondents to take action on his representation dated 27.10.2016 regarding patta issuance. The court directed the competent authority to consider the representation and pass orders on merits without expressing an opinion on the claim's merits.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to consider petitioner's representation dated 27.10.2016 and pass orders on merits expeditiously.

B.Sellamal, W/o.Bannari, Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶3

Dated: 05.01.2017

¶4

Coram The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

W.P.No.43333 of 2016

¶6

1 B.Sellamal [PETITIONER] Vs 1 The District Collector, Collector Office, Erode District. 2 The Special Tahsildar, Thasildar Office, Karattur Road, Sathiyamangalam, Erode District. 3 The Commissioner, Sathiyamangalam Municipality, Sathiyamangalam, Erode District. (R3 impleaded as per order dated 05.01.2017 by BRJ in WMP No.387 of 2017 in W.P.43333 of 2016) [ RESPONDENTS ]

¶7

Prayer:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to take appropriate action upon petitioner's representation dated 27.10.2016.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Chinnaraj For Respondents : Mr.R.S.Selvam Government Advocate

¶9

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to take

¶12

appropriate action upon petitioner's representation dated 27.10.2016.

¶13

2.According to the petitioner, he made a representation dated 27.10.2016, seeking to issue patta in the name of the petitioner. Since there is no reply from the respondents, the present writ petition is filed.

¶14

3.Heard both sides.

¶15

4.In view of the limited prayer sought for in this petition, the respondent concerned is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.10.2016 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner by this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

05.01.2017

vri

1 The District Collector, Collector Office, Erode District.

¶21

2 The Special Tahsildar, Thasildar Office, Karattur Road, Sathiyamangalam, Erode District.

¶22

3 The Commissioner,

¶23

Sathiyamangalam Municipality, Sathiyamangalam,

¶24

Erode District.

B.RAJENDRAN,J. vri

W.P.No.43333 of 2016

05.01.2017

http://www.judis.nic.in

B.Sellamal, W/o.Bannari, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Sellamal, W/o.Bannari, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.v.Sugantha, Vs The District Collector

G.Gunasekaran Vs The Secretary to Government

S.K.Thangavel, Vs The Commissioner

M.Gunasekaran, Vs State rep. by

Arun Louis Sasikumar, Vs The Registrar

K.Thirunavukarasu Mudaliyar Vs Govt. of Tamil Nadu