Dismissed

V.Kumaresan v. The Commissioner

Madras HC24 Jan 2017WP/38799/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging a notice to hand over land used as a pathway. The Court, without expressing an opinion on merits, directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's reply on merits and pass appropriate orders within two months, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider petitioner's reply on merits and pass appropriate orders within two months.

V.Kumaresan Vs The Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 24.01.2017

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.38799 of 2016

¶6

V.Kumaresan ... Petitioner

¶7

vs.
1. The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable
Endowment Department,
Uthama Gandhi Road,
Chennai 600 034.
2. The Joint Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable
Endowment Department,
Dr.Balasundaram Road,
Coimbatore.
3. The Assistant Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable
Endowment Department,
Thirupur.
4. The Executive Officer,
Vishweshwarasamy and
Veeraraghava Perumal Temple,
Nallur, Tiruppur District. ... Respondents

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice dated 13.08.2016, bearing Na.Ka.No.12-7/2016, issued by the 4^th respondent and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents herein from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the pathway in S.No.146/2, Nallur Village, measuring about 0.22 acres of land, without following the due process of law.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.Abrar Mohd. Abdullah for Mr.V.P.K.Gowtham For Respondents 1 to 3: Mr.M.Maharaja, Special Govt. Pleader

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking to quash the impugned notice dated 13.08.2016, bearing Na.Ka.No.12-7/2016, issued by the 4^th respondent and for a consequential direction to forbear the respondents herein from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the pathway in S.No.146/2, Nallur Village, measuring about 0.22 acres of land, without following the due process of law.

¶13

According to the petitioner, he and his wife had purchased a property measuring 2.35 cents comprised in S.No.146/2, Nallur Village vide two registered Sale Deeds bearing Document Nos.2739/2014 and 670/2014, respectively. On coming to know that the pathway for reaching the abovesaid land belongs to Vishweshwarasamy and Veeraraghava Perumal Temples, the petitioner immediately sent a representation dated 25.07.2015 to the respondents for fixing the fair rent for utilizing the pathway measuring 280 feet in length and 230 feet in breadth, totalling an extent of 2 ½ cents of land for reaching his property. While so, the respondent had issued a notice to the petitioner on 13.08.2016 stating that he should hand over possession of 0.22 acres of land used as pathway to his land, within 15 days. The petitioner sent a reply to the same on 27.08.2016 stating that he is not an encroacher and also sought to consider his application seeking fixation of fair rent. Since the 4th respondent is trying to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the pathway, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material documents available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents may be directed to consider the petitioner's reply dated 27.08.2016 to the impugned Notice.

¶16

In reply, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents pointed out that the petitioner has got an alternative pathway to reach his land.

¶17

In such view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's reply dated 27.08.2016 on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.Nos.33256 5o 33258 of 2016 are closed.

¶20

-s/d-

¶21

Assistant Registrar

¶22

True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
aeb
To:
1. The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
Uthama Gandhi Road, Chennai 600 034.
2. The Joint Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore.
3. The Assistant Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department,
Thirupur.
4. The Executive Officer,
Vishweshwarasamy and Veeraraghava Perumal Temple,
Nallur, Tiruppur District.
+1 cc to Mr.V.P.K.Gowtham Advocate sr 4953
+1 cc to Government Pleader sr 4887
W.P.No.38799 of 2016
rk(co)
aa09/02/2017

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Kumaresan v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Kumaresan v. The Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Maheswari, Vs The District Revenue Officer

C.Raghu Vs The General Manager

Mrs.Nachammal, Vs The Tahsildar South

Fathima College of Pharmacy Vs The Registrar

Zion Matriculation Higher Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Chandra, Vs The District Collector