Disposed

Mrs.Nachammal, v. The Tahsildar South

Madras HC23 Jan 2017WP/977/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction to the Thasildhar to consider and decide on a petition for the transfer of patta in the petitioner's name within three months, without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

The respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's application dated 26.10.2016, pass orders on merits after giving an opportunity, and return the order within three months.

Mrs.Nachammal, Vs The Tahsildar South — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 23.01.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

W.P.NO.977 OF 2016

1 Nachammal

[ PETITIONER ]

Vs The Thasildhar South, Thiruppur District, Kolavanchepalayam, Veerapandi Post, Thiruppur. [ RESPONDENTS ] Prayer:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to dispose the petitioner application dated 26.10.2016 thereafter the respondent directed to the petitioner to file an application through online, therefore, the said application was further filed through online in 2016/0103/32/052931 dated 21.12.2016 and transfer the patta in the name of the petitioner from the name of Boothan Board for the land bearing Survey No.321/1 to an extent of 6 acres situated at Veerapandi Village, Palladam Taluk.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.Venkatachalapathy Senior Counsel for Mr.E.Sampathkumar

¶10

For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajeswaran

¶11

Special Government Pleader ORDER

¶12

The petitioner has filed this writ petition to dispose the petitioner's application dated 26.10.2016.

¶13

2.According to the petitioner, he made an application dated 26.10.2016 to the respondent for grant of patta. He also filed application through online on 21.12.2016. Since there was no response from the respondent, the present writ petition is filed.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

3.Heard both sides.

¶16

4.In view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, this court without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, directs the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner dated 26.10.2016 and to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶17

sd/
Assistant Registrar(CO)
/true copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
vri
To
The Thasildhar South,
Thiruppur District,
Kolavanchepalayam,
Veerapandi Post,
Thiruppur.
+1cc to Mr.Sampath Kumar, Advocate SR.No.4221
+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.No.4354
W.P.No.977 of 2017
MG(CO)
GN(16/02/2017)

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.Nachammal, v. The Tahsildar South

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Nachammal, v. The Tahsildar South

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surya Vetrikondan Vs The State, Rep by The Commr.

S.Venkatachalam, Vs The Inspector General of

M/s.Shyam Hotels and Vs The Commissioner of Food

A.R.Mohammed Mushtaq Vs The Regional Passport

E.Kannadasan, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Firos.C.M., Vs The Director