Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

K.Shivashankar, Vs The Commissioner — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

Home
Madras HC
2017
K.Shivashankar, Vs The CommissionerK.Shivashankar, v. The Commissioner

Dismissed

K.Shivashankar, v. The Commissioner

Madras HC6 Apr 2017WP/38053/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as withdrawn by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn; no other relief or performance directed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.04.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

WRIT PETITION No. 38053 of 2016 and W.M.P. Nos.32612 & 32613 of 2016

K.Shivashankar ...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Rippon Building, Chennai – 600 003.
2. The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Town Planning Section,
Corporation of Chennai, Chennai –03.
3. The Executive Officer,
Sholinganallur Town Panchayat,
Sholinganallur, Chennai – 119.
4. The Assistant Commissioner,
Zone-15,Corporation of Chennai,
Chennai – 600 003.
5. The Secretary,
Tamil Nadu Construction Workers Welfare Board,
No.Valluvarkottam High Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34. ...Respondents

Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue writ of certiorarified mandamus , calling for the records relating to the order of Demand Notice issued by the second respondent made in W.D.C.No.CMDA/WDCN15/00214/2016 dated 08.10.2016 to quash the ame and to consequently direct the respondents to release the building permission and license relating to the planning permission granted by the third respondent.

For Petitioners : Mr.L.Chandrakumar

For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar-for R1toR4 Mr.S.Diwakar-for R5 learned Special Government Pleader

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
K. Shivashankar
respondent
Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
respondent
Assistant Executive Engineer, Town Planning Section, Corporation of Chennai
respondent
Executive Officer, Sholinganallur Town Panchayat
respondent
Assistant Commissioner, Zone-15, Corporation of Chennai

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 6 Apr 2017 · April
Registered: 1 Nov 2016
Case no.: WP/38053/2016

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from M.m.sundresh

Prime Tex Unit-B Vs State of Tamil Nadu
5 Apr 2017
Mrs.D.Zeenath Vs The Managing Director
5 Apr 2017
S.Radhai Vs The District Collector
5 Apr 2017
M/s.Blue Ocean Personnel & Vs The Regional Director
6 Apr 2017

Cite this judgement

K.Shivashankar, v. The Commissioner, WP/38053/2016 (MAD), decided on 6 April 2017.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

M.M. Sundresh

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn; no other relief or performance directed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The court dismissed the writ petition as it was formally withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed with no costs awarded.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and has circulated a Letter dated 03.04.2017 to the Registry to that effect. He has also made an endorsement in the petition.

In view of the submission of the letter dated 03.04.2017 to the Registry and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
maya/cse
To

The Commissioner,

Corporation of Chennai,

Rippon Building, Chennai – 600 003. 2. The Assistant Executive Engineer,

Town Planning Section, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai –03. 3. The Executive Officer, Sholinganallur Town Panchayat, Sholinganallur, Chennai – 119. 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Zone-15,Corporation of Chennai, Chennai – 600 003. 5. The Secretary,

Tamil Nadu Construction Workers Welfare Board,

No.Valluvarkottam High Road,

Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34.

+1cc to Mr.L. Chandrakumar, Advocate Sr. 20778 +1cc to Mr.P.V. Selvakumar, Advocate Sr. 20600

W. P. No. 38053 of 2016 and W.M.P. Nos.32612 & 32613 of 2016

VGI(CO) VR(21/4/2017)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent

Secretary, Tamil Nadu Construction Workers Welfare Board

Coram

AI extract

M.M. Sundresh

CNR

HCMA011639752016

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED

Mrs.a.Meena, Vs The Principal Secretary

6 Apr 2017

R.Deivanai, Vs The District Collector

6 Apr 2017