The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's submission.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
WP.No.32439 of 2004
Dr.S.Santhanakrishnan .... Petitioner
Versus
1.The Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
2.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Chennai-600 006. ... Respondents
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant Surgeon and Civil Surgeon on par with dates on which Dr.Paul Raj M.B.B.S., has been promoted to the above said posts and for further promotions as Senior Civil Surgeon in accordance with law, with all service and monetary benefits and to grant such further or appropriate reliefs.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.S.Nandakumar For RR1 & 2 : Mr.T.M.Pappiah, Spl.G.P.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS V )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To
WP.No.32439 of 2004
NR 13/09/2017
Dr. S. Santhanakrishnan
Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department
Director of Medical and Rural Health Services
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
