A writ petition challenging the withholding of pensionary benefits is dismissed as infructuous following the petitioner's counsel's submission to this effect.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
WP.No.18001 of 2004
& WPMP.No.21405 of 2004
Tamil Nadu Retired Officials Association, Chennai-06.
Rep. by its General Secretary Mr.N.Subramaniam.
.... Petitioner
Versus
The Development Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Chennai-9
... Respondent
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to sanction and disburse the balance withheld pensionary benefits of 60% due to be paid to the pensioners including Commutation, D.C.R.G., and encashment of Leave etc., with interest till the date of actual payment and other consequential monetary benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.Prem Narayan for M/s.Sasikala Subramanian
For Respondent : Mr.T.M.Pappiah, Spl.G.P.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dn
To
The Development Commissioner and
Secretary to Government,
Finance Department,
Chennai-9
+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 62125
WP.No.18001 of 2004
arv
aa14/09/2017
Tamil Nadu Retired Officials Association
The Development Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Finance Department
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
