Disposed

M/s.Parameshwary Modern Rice v. The Government of Puducherry

Madras HC18 Dec 2017WP/31900/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought mandamus for payment of value of confiscated rice with interest. Court dismissed the petition, directing the Director to consider a petitioner representation and decide on merits within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass appropriate orders on merits within eight weeks.

M/s.Parameshwary Modern Rice Vs The Government of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.12.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶5

Writ Petition No.31900 of 2017

¶6

M/s.Parameshwary Modern Rice Mill, now re-named as VAIRAVAR MODERN RICE MILL, rep. by its Partners, (1) V.Arumugam (2) V.Saravanan, No.53, Main Road, Ariyalur Post, Puducherry 605 102. .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Government of Puducherry, Rep. by its Joint Secretary, Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry 605 009.

¶7

2.The Director, Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, Puducherry 605 009.

¶8

3.The District Collector, Puducherry 605 009. .. Respondents

¶9

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the value of the confiscated 72,157 Kgs of Boiled Rice along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of seizure i.e.03.03.2012 till the date of payment to the petitioner, within the time fixed by this Court.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Premkumar For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Government Pleader (P)

¶11

This writ petition is filed seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to pay the value of the confiscated 72,157 Kgs of Boiled Rice along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

from the date of seizure i.e.03.03.2012 till the date of payment to the petitioner, within the time fixed by this Court.

¶14

2.Mr.B.Nambi Selvan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and based on instructions, submits that the issue raised by the petitioner will be settled based on the representation made by them on 07.09.2017. He seeks two months time for passing appropriate order. The above submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents is recorded and the writ petition is disposed of, by directing the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.09.2017 and pass appropriate orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶15

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vri
To
1.The Joint Secretary,
The Government of Puducherry,
Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,
Puducherry 605 009.
2.The Director,
Department of Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs,
Puducherry 605 009.
3.The District Collector,
Puducherry 605 009.
+1cc to Mr.K.Premkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.90232
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.90422
W.P.No.31900 of 2017
VGI(CO)
RRK(17/01/2018)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Parameshwary Modern Rice v. The Government of Puducherry

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Parameshwary Modern Rice v. The Government of Puducherry

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thirupathi Nehru Vs The Superintendent of

R.Bharathi Vs The District Collector

R.Nagendra Babu, Vs The District Collector

S.Rajesh, Vs The Regional Transport

Annai Indira Nalvazhvu Vs The Additional Chief Secretary

R.Elangovan Vs The Superintendent of Police