The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition filed for compassionate appointment under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition was withdrawn by the petitioner via letter, leading to the court dismissing the petition as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.07.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No. 30510 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.26442 of 2016
K.Sharmila ...Petitioner
Vs
1. The Deputy Commissioner,
O/o.The Principal Secretary &
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
(Enforement – 1), Greams Road,
Chennai – 600 006.
3. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Chennai (South) Division,
Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006.
4. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
(Enforcement -Central), Greams Road,
Chennai – 600 006. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.4101/2015/A2 dated 15.04.2016 on the file of the 2nd respondent and earlier order in Memo No.Y3/45358/2011 dated 28.01.2014 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same; consequently direct the respondents to give compassionate appointment to the petitioner without reference to the reason of her marriage at the time of application, within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Neelakandan
O R D E R
The writ petition has been listed under the caption “for withdrawal” on the basis of the letter dated 04.07.2017 given by the learned counsel for the petitioner before the Registry. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (J)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
maya
To
1. The Deputy Commissioner,
O/o.The Principal Secretary &
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
2. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
(Enforement – 1), Greams Road,
Chennai – 600 006.
3. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Chennai (South) Division,
Greams Road, Chennai – 600 006.
W.P.No. 30510 of 2016
K.Sharmila
The Deputy Commissioner, O/o. The Principal Secretary & Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai
The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Enforement – 1), Chennai
The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chennai (South) Division
The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, (Enforcement -Central), Chennai
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
