This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :10.10.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.3004 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 D.M.Venkateshwaralu ..Petitioner Vs The District Manager, Tasmac Ltd., Chennai North District, Chennai – 58. .. Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned notice in Na.Ka.No.A1/248/2014 dated 06.01.2014 on the file of the Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Neelakandan For Respondent : No Appearance O R D E R The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the Writ Petition has already became infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sub-Assistant Registrar
kak
To The District Manager, Tasmac Ltd., Chennai North District, Chennai – 58.
W.P.No.3004 of 2014
SP(07/11/2017)
D.M. Venkateshwaralu
The District Manager, Tasmac Ltd., Chennai North District, Chennai – 58
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
