R.Venugopalan, v. the Government of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 challenging disciplinary proceedings and seeking promotion quashing quashed via non-prosecution as petitioner was not present.
Writ petition under Article 226 challenging disciplinary proceedings and seeking promotion quashing quashed via non-prosecution as petitioner was not present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.10.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.9769 of 2010
R.Venugopalan .. Petitioner
Vs
1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the disciplinary proceedings as against the petitioner initiated by the 2nd respondent bearing reference No.M1/37403/05 dated 11.07.2005 together with all the note files and thereon quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to finalize the promotion list to the post of Personal Assistant to the 2nd respondent from the post of Superintendent including the name of the petitioner at the appropriate place in the said promotion list without taking into consideration the impugned charge memo dated 11.07.2005.
O R D E R
The Matter was listed for hearing on 06.10.2017 and there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. Once again, the case is listed for hearing under the caption “for dismissal” on 09.10.2017, but today also none represented on behalf of the writ petitioner.
Thus, the writ petition stands dismissed for Nonprosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
-sd/-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
dna
To
1.The Principal Secretary,
The Government of Tamil Nadu
Environment and Forest Department,
Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
Panagal Maaligai, Saidapet,
Chennai 600 015.
+1 C.C. to The Government Pleader SR.NO. 72370
W.P.No.9769 of 2010
PVS (CO)
VS 17.11.2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Venugopalan
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
S.M. Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court