V.S Sarma v. Secretary and Officiating
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenged by the petitioner who had already superannuated from service was dismissed as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 30.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P. No.29843 of 2002
V.S.Sarma .. Petitioner
-vs-
- 1.Secretary and Officiating Director, Corporate Office, Nariman Point, Mumbai, Pin Code – 400 021.
2.Manager, HRD, Air India Unit complex, Pallavaram, Chennai. .. Respondents
(R2 amended as per order of this Court dated 30.12.2002 in W.P.M.P. No.58088/2002 by KSJ)
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Lead Operator taking into consideration the date of initial appointment to the post of Junior Operator from 1983.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.S.Sarma
- respondent
Secretary and Officiating Director, Corporate Office, Nariman Point, Mumbai
- respondent
Manager, HRD, Air India Unit complex, Pallavaram, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court