Dismissed

Anupparpalayam Primary Agricul v. the Principal District Judge

Madras HC27 Jan 2017WP/21315/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a cooperative bank challenging an order that set aside a surcharge order. The impugned order noted a violation of natural justice. The Court found no reason to interfere as the lower court explicitly ruled against the surcharge based on justice principles, and the petitioner was absent.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed. No costs awarded.

Anupparpalayam Primary Agricul Vs the Principal… — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 27.01.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶5

W.P. No.21315 of 2002

¶6

Anupparpalayam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank,

¶7

rep. by its Special Officer .. Petitioner -vs-

¶8

1.The Principal District Judge, Coimbatore. 2.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Pollachi. 3.M.Ramaswamy .. Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 16.08.2001 passed in Co-operative Miscellaneous Appeal No.16 of 1996 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore, the first respondent herein.

¶10

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Selvaraj for R1 Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Special Government Pleader (Co-op) for R2 Mr.R.Sivakumar for R3

¶11

This writ petition is filed challenging an order dated 16.08.2001 passed by the Principal District Judge, setting aside surcharge order dated 25.08.1995.

¶12

2.The petitioner was called absent on earlier occasions as well as today, both initially as well as after having been passed over. The order sheet reveals several prior adjournments. The matter is thus taken up for hearing in the presence of Mr.Sivakumar, learned counsel for R3, who is heard.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

3.The impugned order contains an unambiguous finding of fact that the surcharge order was passed contrary to the principle of natural justice and that no opportunity had been granted while passing the same.

¶15

4.In view of the aforesaid findings, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order impugned to. This writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶16

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
vga
To
1.The Principal District Judge,
Coimbatore.
2.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Pollachi.
+1 C.C. to M/S.R.SIVAKUMAR, Advocate SR.NO. 5205/17
W.P. No.21315 of 2002
NRJK(CO)
T.R (06/10/2017)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Anupparpalayam Primary Agricul v. the Principal District Judge

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anupparpalayam Primary Agricul v. the Principal District Judge

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India Rep by the Vs M/S.Ganapathy Smelters Ltd.

R.Maheswaran Vs 1.THE Dt.Collector, Coimbatore

M/S.Premier Marine Products Vs the Commissioner of Incomt Tax

Tn Cable T.v.Operators Vs S/T.N. Rep by Its Secretary

Jayabalan Vs 1.JOINT Regr.of Coop. Societie

K. Akbar Vs Superintendent Engineer