Court granted permission to withdraw two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petitions. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.
Permission granted to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to file fresh writ petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 30.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.Nos. 27745 of 2010 & 2108 of 2011 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2010 in W.P.No.27745/2010 & M.P.Nos.2 & 3 of 2011 in W.P.No.2108/2011
Namakkal District Sugarcane Growers Association Rep. by its Secretary K.Kumar 2/85, Nachipudur Kaliappa Naickenpatti (via) Namakkal Taluk & District ... Petitioner in W.P.No.27745/2010 S.Jayasudha ... Petitioner in W.P.No.2108/2011 Vs 1.The Commissioner of Sugars/ Cane Commissioner of Tamil Nadu 690, Anna Salai Chennai - 600 035. .... 1st Respondent in both WPs 2.The Asst. Director of Agriculture and Inspector of Sugars Namakkal District, Namakkal 3.The Superintendent of Police Namakkal District, Namakkal 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal 5.The Salem Co-operative Sugar Mills Mohanur Namakkal District .. Respondents 2 to 5 in W.P.No.27745/2010 6.The Asst. Director of Agriculture and Inspector of Sugars Cuddalore District, Cuddalore 7.The Superintendent of Police Cuddalore District, Cuddalore
8.The Revenue Divisional Officer
Vridhachalam Division, Cuddalore District
9.Shri Ambika Sugars Ltd.,
Rep. by its Senior General Manager
Eraiyur Pennadam R.S. Thittagudi Taluk
Cuddalore District, - 606 111. .. Respondents 2 to 5
in W.P.No.2108/2011
The writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of
Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Notification
dated 23.9.2010 of the 1st respondent herein in
Rc.No.17278/Cane-2/2010 and quash the same.
For Petitioner: Mr.AL.Ganthimathi
For Respondents: Mr.A.Rajaperumal
Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R4
in both WPs
Mr.N.Senthil Kumar -
for R5 (in W.P.No.27745/2010)
Mr.R.Parthasarathy-for R5
in W.P.No.2108/2011
COMMON ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seek
permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petitions
with liberty to file fresh writ petitions. and he has also
made an endorsement to that effect. Permission is granted.
Accordingly, Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with
liberty to file fresh writ petitions. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also
dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
smi
To
1.The Commissioner of Sugars/ Cane Commissioner of Tamil Nadu 690, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 035. 2.The Asst. Director of Agriculture and Inspector of Sugars, Namakkal District, Namakkal 3.The Superintendent of Police Namakkal District, Namakkal 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer Namakkal Taluk, Namakkal 5.The Salem Co-operative Sugar Mills Mohanur, Namakkal District 6.The Asst. Director of Agriculture and Inspector of Sugars Cuddalore District, Cuddalore 7.The Superintendent of Police Cuddalore District, Cuddalore 8.The Revenue Divisional Officer Vridhachalam Division, Cuddalore District +1cc to M/S.AL.Gandhimathi, Advocate Sr.5623 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.6234
W.P.Nos. 27745 of 2010 & 2108 of 2011 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2010 in W.P.No.27745/2010 & M.P.Nos.2 & 3 of 2011 in W.P.No.2108/2011
rj[co] srg 21/2/2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Namakkal District Sugarcane Growers Association Rep. by its Secretary K.Kumar
S.Jayasudha
Commissioner of Sugars/ Cane Commissioner of Tamil Nadu
Asst. Director of Agriculture and Inspector of Sugars Namakkal District
Superintendent of Police Namakkal District
Revenue Divisional Officer Namakkal Taluk
D.krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
