K.v.Palanisamy v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ to direct deposit of decree amount without TDS. Court dismissed petition as infructuous based on counsel's endorsement.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.11.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
W.P.No.28326 of 2008
and M.P.Nos.1 of 2008
Mr.K.V.Palanisamy
Rep by his Power Agent
K.Kuppusamy
Son of Kandasamy Gounder
Porayankaran
Mugasipidariyur Village
Chennimalai,
Perundurai Taluk, Erode. .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector
Erode.
2.The District Adi Dravida Welfare Officer
Erode.
3.The Special Tahsildar [Adi Dravida Welfare]
Kangayam, Erode District.
4.The Sub Treasury Officer
Kangayam, Kangayam Taluk
Erode District.
5.The Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Office
Gandhiji Road, Erode. ..Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to deposit the entire decree amount as directed by this Hon'ble Court in C.M.P.No.14528 of 2004 in A.S.No.966 of 2004, dated 14.09.2004 without deducting tax at source under Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the credit of the suit in O.S.No.258 of 2000 on the file of the Sub-Court, Dharapuram, Erode District.
(Amunded the prayer & Writ petition as per court order dt.9/2/09 in MP.1/09 in WP.283256/08 in this court)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mr. K.V. Palanisamy
- respondent
The District Collector, Erode
- respondent
The District Adi Dravida Welfare Officer, Erode
- respondent
The Special Tahsildar [Adi Dravida Welfare], Kangayam, Erode District
- respondent
The Sub Treasury Officer, Kangayam, Kangayam Taluk, Erode District
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court