Partly allowed

Tvl.Madhu Jayanthi v. The Assistant Commissioner

Madras HC1 Nov 2017WP/27925/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax to consider the petitioner's representations regarding a manually filed Form 'W' for a specific tax period and pass appropriate orders on merits within four weeks, citing a previous decision allowing manual processing of such forms.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to consider petitioner's representations and pass orders on merits within four weeks regarding the processing of Form 'W' and grant of refund.

Tvl.Madhu Jayanthi Vs The Assistant Commissioner — Income Tax | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 01.11.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

W.P.NO.27925 OF 2017

¶6

Tvl.Madhu Jayanthi International

¶7

Ltd., rep.by its Manager R.Sivakumar

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Velandipalayam Assessment Circle, Coimbatore-2. ...Respondent

¶11

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to process Form 'W' filed manually by the petitioner from the month of March 2013 to March 2016 amounting to Rs.1,42,16,154/- and grant refund within a stipulated period.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, AGP

¶13

Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶14

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to process Form W manually filed by the petitioner for the period from March 2013 to March 2016 and grant refund.

¶15

The petitioner's case is that Form W has been filed within the stipulated time of 180 days, as the dealer's turnover related to export turnover attracting 'zero' (0) rate of tax. It is further stated that there is no legal embargo to consider the manually filed forms and a similar view was taken by this Court in the case of Tvl.Mahaajay Spinners India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CTO, Arisipalayam Assessment Circle, Salem [W.P.No.28275 of 2016] dated 30.8.2016.

¶16

Considering the above submissions made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 07.10.2017, followed by the reminder dated 10.10.2017 and pass appropriate orders thereon on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. While doing so, the respondent shall take note of the decision of this Court in the case of Tvl.Mahaajay Spinners India Pvt. Ltd. No costs.

¶19

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
The Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Velandipalayam
Assessment Circle, Coimbatore-2.
+1 CC to Mr.K.R. Krishnan, Advocate sr 77208.
+1 cC to Spl. Govt. Pleader sr 77890.
WP.No.27925 of 2017
SP(14/11/2017)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tvl.Madhu Jayanthi v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl.Madhu Jayanthi v. The Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.K.Industries-Iv Vs Commissioner of Customs

M/s.General Radio & Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Foundation Garments Private Vs the Assistant Commissioner

K.v.Palanisamy Vs the District Collector

M/s.Bhavanimatha Electrical Vs The State Tax Officer

S.Arputharaj, Vs The Deputy Commissioner