Dismissed

M/s.Top Adhesives v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC2 Jun 2017WP/2694/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble Madras High Court dismissed a Writ Petition seeking declaration that Entry 67 of the TNVAT Act, 2006 is discriminatory and violative of constitutional provisions regarding inter-state sales. The Court applied the ratio of a previous batch judgment.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition challenging Entry 67 of TNVAT Act, 2006 declared discriminatory/ultra vires by Article 226 prayer was dismissed.

M/s.Top Adhesives Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.06.2017 CORAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶3

W.P.No.2694 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.2248 of 2016

¶4

M/s.Top Adhesives,

¶5

rep. by its Proprietor - alimur Rahman No.40, Raja Street, Ambur - 635 802 Vellore District.

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The State of Tamil Nadu,

¶9

represented by the Secretary, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fort St. George,

¶10

Chennai - 600 009.

¶11

The Assistant Commissioner (CT),

¶12

Ambur, Vellore District. .... Respondents

¶13

PETITION filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Declaration to declare Entry 67 of Part 'B' of the First Schedule to the TNVAT Act, 2006 in respect of goods sold on inter-state basis as discriminatory and ultra vires the Constitution of India and violative of Articles 14, 301, 303 and 304 of Part XIII of the Constitution of India, as it postulates the condition of industrial inputs being used for manufacture only "in the State" for the purpose of levy of tax @ 5%.

¶14

For Petitioner : Ms.R.Hemalatha

¶15

For Respondents : No appearance

¶16

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.)

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the issue raised in the captioned Writ Petition is covered against the petitioner, in view of the ratio of the judgment dated 05.04.2016, passed in a batch of matters, the lead Writ Petition

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

being: W.P.No.37604 of 2007, titled: M/s.Schwing Stetter (India) Pvt. Ltd. V. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and another, which, on a parity of reasoning would apply to the instant case.

¶20

Accordingly, the captioned Writ Petition stands dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sl
To
1. The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu,
Commercial Taxes and Registration Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai - 600 009.
2. The Assistant Commissioner (CT),
Ambur, Vellore District.
+1 cc to M/s.R.Hemalatha Advocate sr 39746
+1 cc to the Special Government Pleader sr 39657

¶22

W.P.No.2694 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.2248 of 2016

¶23

ad(co) aa16/06/2017

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Top Adhesives v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Top Adhesives v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Commissioner of Service Vs Mphasis Limited

M/S. Madras Cements Limited Vs Customs, Excise and Service

U.Ravi Vs the Commerical Tax Officer

M/S. Ayya Communications Vs the Commissioner of Central

M/S. Wavoo Jewelers Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Assistant Commissioner

M/S.Shree Ambika Sugars Ltd., Vs the Commissioner of Central