The appeal was dismissed as not pressed by the appellant, despite arguments that the involved amount was small and questions of law should remain open. The connected miscellaneous petition was also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed; connected miscellaneous petition dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.06.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
C.M.A.No.925 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
M/s.Ayya Communications, 103, Madurai Road, Theni - 625 531 Theni District. ... Appellant Vs.
The Commissioner of Central Excise, Lal Bahadur Shastri Marg, Madurai - 625 002. ... Respondent
Appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 14.01.2011 made in Final Order No.58/2011 on the file of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.M.N.Bharathi For Respondents : Mr.T.Pramod Kumar Chopda
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.)
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sl
To
1.The Customs,
Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal,
South Zonal Bench,
Chennai 600 006.
2.The Section Officer/Record Keeper,
V.R.Section,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.T.Pramod Kumar Chopda, Advocate, S.R.No.39590
C.M.A.No.925 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
NRJK(CO)
CA(19/06/2017)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Ayya Communications
The Commissioner of Central Excise
Rajiv Shakdher
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
