M.Manimaran v. the Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking admission counselling for a law course as the writ became infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P. No.26269 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013 M.Manimaran .. Petitioner Vs. The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University, No.5, Poompazhil, Dr.D.G.S.Dhinakaran Salai, Chennai - 600 028. .. Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the admission counselling for B.L. 3 year course for the year 2013-14, which is to be held on 19.09.2013, and further, to direct the respondent to admit the petitioner to the B.L.3 year law degree course. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shyam Sunder For Respondent : No appearance
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous, and hence, he sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Writ Petition today.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Manimaran
- respondent
The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University
Coram
D. Krishnakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court