Allowed

B.Bhuvaneshwari v. The District Collector

Madras HC21 Sept 2017WP/25309/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner sought a directive to survey her house site. The court, at the admission stage, directed the District Collector and Surveyor to consider the petitioner's representation and conduct the survey after giving notice to interested parties within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

The respondents were directed to consider the petitioner's representation and conduct the survey after giving notice to interested parties within eight weeks.

B.Bhuvaneshwari Vs The District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 21.09.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

W.P.No.25309 of 2017

¶6

B.Bhuvaneshwari ...Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1. The District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram 2.The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office Maduranthagam Taluk Kancheepuram Dsitrict

¶9

The Surveyor Maduranthagam Taluk Kancheepuram District ... Respondents

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to conduct survey the petitioner's house site in Natham Old Survey No.71/4, New No.523/11 and Patta No.33, situated at No.149, Mariamman Koil Street, Pudhur Village, Maduranthagam Taluk, Kancheepuram District on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 04.07.2017, within a time frame.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Chellapandian

¶12

For Respondents : Mr.R.Rajeswaran

¶13

Special Govt. Pleader

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶16

The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to conduct survey in respect of her house site in Natham Old Survey No.71/4, New No.523/11 and Patta No.33, situated at No.149, Mariamman Koil Street, Pudhur Village, Maduranthagam Taluk, Kancheepuram District on the basis of her representation dated 04.07.2017, within a time frame. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has paid the necessary charges for surveying the land and also given a representation dated 04.07.2017, which has not yet been considered by the respondents 2 and 3.

¶18

Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the respondents 2 and 3 may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.07.2017 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks.

¶19

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.07.2017 and pass orders, in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the interested parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

With this observation, the writ petition is disposed
of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Rj
To
1. The District Collector
Kancheepuram District
Kancheepuram
2.The Tahsildar
Tahsildar Office
Maduranthagam Taluk
Kancheepuram Dsitrict
3. The Surveyor
Maduranthagam Taluk
Kancheepuram District
+ 1 cc to MR.K.T.S. Sivakumar, Advocate Sr.70004
+ 1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.69825
W.P.No.25309 of 2017
CS-IV
EU(11/10/2017 )

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Bhuvaneshwari v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Bhuvaneshwari v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Taimore Ali Khan, Vs State rep. by Inspector

S.Vijayanand Vs District Collector

M/s.v.Link System (P) Ltd., Vs The Commissioner of Fisheries

Munusamy Vs The District Revenue Officer

Sri Shakthi kailamman Temple Vs The Collector

K.K.M.Sambanthan Naicker, Vs The Tahsildar