Disposed

Taimore Ali Khan, v. State rep. by Inspector

Madras HC20 Sept 2017WP/25153/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed for mandamus directing police to act on a representation seeking permission for a procession on Muharram. The court directed the respondent to consider the representation and pass orders after hearing.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.09.2017 and pass orders after opportunity of hearing by 29.09.2017.

Taimore Ali Khan, Vs State rep. by… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 20.09.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The Honourable MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

W.P.No.25153 of 2017

Taimore Ali Khan

[ Petitioner ]

State represented by Inspector of Police Salem Town Police Station Salem District [ Respondent]

¶10

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider and take action on petitioner's representation dated 06.09.2017.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan For Respondent : Mr.S.Navaneethan, AGP ORDER

¶12

Mr.S.Navaneethan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶13

The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider and take action on his representation dated 06.09.2017.

¶14

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has given a representation dated 06.09.2017 to the respondent seeking permission to conduct procession on 01.01.2017 on account of Muharram between 10.00 a.m. And 02.00 p.m., however, the respondent has not passed any order so far.

¶15

Mr.S.Naveenathan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation taking into consideration the ground reality in the area and pass orders in accordance with law, on or before 29.09.2017.

¶16

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to

¶17

the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.09.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, on or before 29.09.2017.

¶18

With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶19

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
rg
To
1. The Inspector of Police
Salem Town Police Station
Salem District
copy to
Mr.S. Navaneethan
Additional Govt. Pleader
High Court, Madras.
+1 Cc to Mr.R. Thamaraiselvan, Advocate sr 69195.
W.P.No.25153 of 2017
SP(22/09/2017)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Taimore Ali Khan, v. State rep. by Inspector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taimore Ali Khan, v. State rep. by Inspector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Ashok, Vs The District Collector

Parvathi, Vs The District Revenue Officer

M.Kalidoss, S/o.Muthaiah, Vs The District Collector

S.Vijayanand Vs District Collector

M/s.v.Link System (P) Ltd., Vs The Commissioner of Fisheries

Shankari Kumaran, Vs The Corporation of Chennai