Allowed

Mrs. Vijaya, v. The District Collector of

Madras HC24 Aug 2017WP/22670/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition filed seeking directions to authorities to consider a representation for allotment of an alternate ready-built house. The court directed the respondents to pass orders within eight weeks while maintaining the status quo, subject to eviction if the petitioner is found to be an encroacher.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to respondents to consider petitioner's representation and pass orders within eight weeks; status quo maintained pending orders.

Mrs. Vijaya, Vs The District Collector of — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.08.2017

¶2

CORAM

¶3

The Honourable MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶4

W.P.No.22670 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.23771 of 2017

¶5

Vijaya

¶6

[ Petitioner ] Vs 1. The District Collector of Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District. 2. The Secretary, The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Triplicane, Chennai 5.

¶7

The Thasildhar, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai 19. [ Respondents]

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.06.2017and pass necessary orders within a stipulated time.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ponnusamy For Respondents : Mr.E.Balamurugan, AGP (R1&3) Mr.M.Rajasekar (R2)

¶10

ORDER

¶11

Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 and 3 and Mr.M.Rajasekar, learned counsel takes notice for the 2^nd respondent. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶12

The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writs of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on her representation dated 29.06.2017, within a stipulated time.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the fact that the petitioner has given a representation as early as on 29.06.2017, requesting the authorities to allot and provide alternate ready built house for her immediate occupation, since she cannot stand in the street without alternative house, the 1^st respondent has not passed any order so far.

¶15

Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1and 3 submitted that the 1^st and 3^rd respondents may be directed to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 29.06.2017, in accordance with law, within a time frame.

¶16

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 1^st and 3^rd respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.06.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, status-quo shall be maintained. However, I make it clear that in the event of the petitioner found to be an encroacher, the respondents are at liberty to evict her in accordance with law.

¶17

With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rg To 1. The District Collector of Thiruvallur, Thiruvallur District.

¶18

The Secretary, The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Triplicane, Chennai 5.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

The Thasildhar, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai 19.

¶21

+1 cc to Mr.R.Ponnusamy Advocate sr 60985

¶22

+1 cc to Mr.M.Rajasekhar Advocate sr 61135

¶23

+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 61941

¶24

W.P.No.22670 of 2017

¶25

gjII(co)
aa13/09/2017

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs. Vijaya, v. The District Collector of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Vijaya, v. The District Collector of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Muthusamy Vs The District Collector

S.Mohan, Vs The Tahsildar

Southern Polypet P.Ltd., Vs The Union of India

S.Udayashankar Vs the Executive Officer

N.Rajaram Vs the Commissioner

Mrs.Vanaroja, Vs The District Collector of