Dismissed

P.Rajam, v. The Corporation of Chennai

Madras HC7 Jun 2017WP/22515/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the petitioner to approach the Vending Committee constituted by a previous order for a street vendor licence within two weeks. The court maintained the existing interim injunction pending the committee's decision and dismissed the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to apply to the Vending Committee within two weeks; interim injunction continued until orders passed; writ petition disposed of.

P.Rajam, Vs The Corporation of Chennai — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

AIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

W.P.No.22515 of 2014

¶6

& M.P.No.1 of 2014 P.Rajam ... Petitioner

¶7

– Vs - 1.The Corporation of Chennai, Rep. by Commissioner, Ripon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.

¶8

2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 3.V.Anbazhagan ...Respondents

¶9

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the application/representation of the petitioner dated 24.06.2014 for issuance of licence/certificate as Street Vendor in accordance with law.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shakespeare For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar for R1

¶11

Mr.S.Diwakar

¶12

Spl. Government Pleader for R2

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This writ petition is filed to direct the first respondent to consider and pass orders on the application/representation of the petitioner dated 24.06.2014 for issuance of licence/certificate as Street Vendor in accordance with law.

¶15

The petitioner's request can only be made before the Vending Committee, which has been constituted by the order passed by this Court and followed by the Government Order.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Considering the facts of the case and interim injunction has already been granted coupled with the import of Section 16 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, the petitioner is directed to make an application before the Vending Committee within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till passing orders on the said application, the interim injunction already granted shall continue.

¶18

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
raa
To
1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai,
Ripon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.
2.The Secretary to Government,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Municipal Administration & Water Supply
Department, Fort St. George,
Chennai-600 009.
+1cc to Mr.K.Shakespeare, Advocate, S.R.No.40594
+1cc to Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.40488
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.40741

¶20

W.P.No.22515 of 2014 PA(CO) RS(20/06/2017)

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Rajam, v. The Corporation of Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Rajam, v. The Corporation of Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Vensar Vs The Commissioner

M.Palani Vs The chairman

Balaji Singh, Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

Adhi.Senthilkumar, Vs The District Collector

K.Jayaprakash Vs The Chennai Metropolitan Water

Raman Vs The District Collector