In this writ petition, the petitioner sought mandamus for disbursement of compensation for acquired land. The Court directed the third respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's representation within six weeks and disposed of the petition.
Direction to the third respondent to pass orders on the petitioners representation within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.06.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
W.P.No.7311 of 2017
Raman .... Petitioner
– Vs -
3.The Special Tahsildar (L.A.,) SIPCOT, Sriperampathur, Unit-2, Kancheepuram District, Kattankulathur. ... Respondents
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents particularly the third respondent to disburse the compensation amount for the petitioner's land acquired for the SIPCOT, Sriperumbathur Expansion Scheme based on the petitioner's representation dated 14.03.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mohammed Aseef For Respondents : Mrs.M.E.Raniselvam, Addl. Government Pleader
ORDER
With the grievance that despite the lands having been acquired as early as in the year 2013, the compensation has not been paid, a representation has been made by the petitioner on 14.03.2017. Seeking appropriate orders, the present writ petition has been filed.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
raa
To
1.The District Collector,
Kancheepuram.
2.The District Revenue Officer,
SIPCOT, Sriperampathur,
Kancheepuram District.
3.The Special Tahsildar (L.A.,)
SIPCOT, Sriperampathur, Unit-2,
Kancheepuram District,
Kattankulathur.
+1 cc to M/s.Mohammed Aseef Advocate sr 40898
+1 cc to Government Pleader sr 40748
W.P.No.7311 of 2017
sv(co)
aa20/06/2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the third respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's representation regarding delayed payment of land acquisition compensation.
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of due to limited scope of prayer.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raman
The District Collector, Kancheepuram
The District Revenue Officer, SIPCOT, Sriperampathur
The Special Tahsildar (L.A.,) SIPCOT, Sriperampathur
M.M. Sundresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
