Disposed

The Tamil Nadu Process Server v. The Principal Secretary

Madras HC2 Mar 2017WP/22394/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Madras, in two writ petitions filed by junior bailiffs and an association challenging a pay scale order, accepted the Special Government Pleader's note that the State Government had rejected the claim via a later order. The Court disposed of the petitions by closing connected petitions while preserving liberty to question the correctness of the Government orders.

What did the court decide?

Connected miscellaneous petitions closed; liberty reserved to question the correctness of State Government orders in the future.

The Tamil Nadu Process Server Vs The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.03.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE NOOTY. RAMAMOHANA RAO and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶2

W.P.Nos.22394, 33261 of 2015 and M.P.No.2 of 2015 in W.P.No.22394 of 2015

¶3

The Tamil Nadu Process Server (Junior Bailiff) Association, having Registered Office at

¶4

Sub Court, Ponneri,
rep by its President T.Dhanapal ... Petitioner in
W.P.22394/2015
A.Perumal ... Petitioner in
W.P.33261/2015
Vs.
1.The Principal Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Finance (Pay Cell) Department,
Fort St.George, Madras – 600 009.
2.The Principal Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Home Department,
Fort St.George, Madras – 600 009.
3.The Registrar General,
High Court, Madras – 600 104. ... Respondents 1 to 3 in
W.Ps.22394, 33261/2015
4.The Principal District Judge,
Villupuram. ... 4 th Respondent in
W.P.33261/2015

¶5

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of certiorari to call for the records in G.O.Ms.No.193 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 06.07.2015 issued by the 1^st respondent and quash the same.

¶6

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy (in W.P.22394/2015) For Petitioner : Mr.V.Bhiman (in W.P.33261/2015) For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Shivashanmugasundaram, (in W.Ps.22394 & 33261/15) Special Government Pleader (R1 & R2)

¶8

Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi

¶9

(R3 in W.P.22394/15 and R3 & R4 in W.P.33261/15) C O M M O N O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by NOOTY.RAMAMOHANA RAO,J.) Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugasundaram, learned Special Government Pleader has brought to our notice that the State Government has taken a final decision and published the same through G.O.Ms.No.82 Home (Courts V) Department, dated 23.01.2017 considering the request of the writ petitioner Association and rejected their claim for revision of the pay scale.

¶10

2.In this view of the matter, we preserve liberty to call in question the correctness of the orders passed by the State Government, referred to supra and dispose of both the Writ Petitions. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy//

¶11

Sub Assistant Registrar va To

¶12

1.The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St.George, Madras – 600 009.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

2.The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Fort St.George, Madras – 600 009.

¶15

3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras – 600 104.

¶16

4.The Principal District Judge, Villupuram.

¶17

+1cc to Mr.S. Haja Mohideen Gisthi, Advocate, S.R.No.13741
+1cc to Mr.R. Marudhachalamurthy, Advocate, S.R.No.14363
+1cc to Mr. V. Bhiman, Advocate Sr.No.13832
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.13838
rv(CO)
md(13/03/2017)
W.P.Nos.22394, 33261 of 2015
and M.P.No.2 of 2015
in W.P.No.22394 of 2015

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Tamil Nadu Process Server v. The Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Tamil Nadu Process Server v. The Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. C. Muniandi, Vs Union of India

L Vetrinilavan Vs Lakshmi

K.Jayaraman Vs the Official Liquidator

J.Naveen Raj, Vs The District Judge

Selvi R.Visoliya Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Omne Agate Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Southern Triple a Invest