Disposed

Govindan v. The Special Commissioner

Madras HC18 Aug 2017WP/21950/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this matter, the Division Benches of the Madras High Court was taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself based on consent. As per a previous order, the learned counsel for the respondent suggested the petitioner that the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court can be followed in this writ petition also. The Division Bench of this Court is to dispose of the writ petition in ac

What did the court decide?

Directs the Vending Committee to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within three months, pending which no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner.

Govindan Vs The Special Commissioner — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 18.08.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶6

W.P.No.21950 of 2017
Govindan ... Petitioner
v.
1. The Special Commissioner
for Handicapped,
Office of the State Commissioner of Disabled
No.15/1, Model School Road,
Thousand Lights, Chennai 6.
2. The Commissioner
Corporation of Chennai
Rippon Buildings
Chennai - 600 003.
3.The Commissioner of Police,
E.V.R. High Road,
Chennai 7. ... Respondents

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 28.05.2017 for issuance of License Bunk Shop on the line of Sydemhnans Road by the side of Corporation Community Hall, Kainnappathidal (Part Town), Chennai 3, business on rental Tarpaulines.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sudhakar For Respondents : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar Addl. Government Pleader

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶13

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of his representation dated 28.05.2017 for issuance of License for the Bunk Shop on the line of Sydemhnans Road by the side of Corporation Community Hall, Kainnappathidal (Part Town), Chennai 3,

¶14

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in similar circumstances, the Division Bench of this court, by order dated 28.02.2017, passed the following order:-

¶15

"5.On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, suffice it to direct the Vending Committee constituted vide G.O.(4D)No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MCI) Department, dated 05.10.2016, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.1.2017 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. All the ground urged in this petition can be raised before the Committee."

¶16

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶17

¶18

Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader,

¶19

appearing for the respondents submitted that the order passed by the Division Bench of this court can be followed in this writ petition also.

¶20

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, I direct the Vending Committee constituted vide G.O.(4D)No.5, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (MCI) Department, dated 05.10.2016, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 28.05.2017 and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and till such time, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. All the grounds urged in this writ petition can be raised before the Committee.

¶21

With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

18.08.2017
2/2

The Special Commissioner for Handicapped, Office of the State Commissioner of Disabled No.15/1, Model School Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai 6.

¶26

The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Buildings Chennai - 600 003.

¶27

http://www.judis.nic.in

M.DURAISWAMY, J.

3.The Commissioner of Police, E.V.R. High Road,

Chennai 7.

W.P.No.21950 of 2017

18.08.2017

2/2

http://www.judis.nic.in

Govindan v. The Special Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govindan v. The Special Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Mani, Vs State Rep. by

K.Sundararaj, Vs The Inspector General of

N.Annadurai Vs The District Revenue Officer

Karthikai Rajan Vs The Special Commissioner

R.Chokkammal Vs The Commissioner of Hr & Ce

V.Akila Vs The Commissioner of Hr & Ce