Writ petition allowed at admission stage directing the respondent to hear and dispose of the petitioner's pending appeal on merits within eight weeks of receiving a copy of this order.
Directed the respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal on merits within eight weeks of receiving a copy of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.08.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
W.P.No.21348 of 2017
B.R.Manoharan ... Petitioner v.
The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary Industries Department Fort st. George Chennai 600 009 ... Respondent
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to hear and dispose of the Second Appeal dated 24.03.2017 filed on 27.03.2017 against the order of the Commissioner of the Geology and Mining passed in Pro. No. 12176/ MM9/ 2012, dated 14.02.2017 on merits within the time frame fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muthu Kumaraswamy
For Respondent : Mr.R.Rajeswaran Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS III ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar Rj To The Principal Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Industries Department Fort st. George Chennai 600 009
+1cc to M/s.K.Muthukumarasamy,Advocate sr.57676 +1cc to Government Pleader sr.58875
W.P.No.21348 of 2017
skv(co) ss(29/8/2017)
B.R. Manoharan
The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Principal Secretary Industries Department
M. Duraiswamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
